You are Here
Uncategorized

Full text of the tribunal report

Full text of the tribunal report

05-Dec-2006BEFORE THE ANTI-DOPING APPEALS COMMITTEE CONSTITUED BY THE PAKISTAN CRICKET BOARDShoaib Akhtar (Appellant) & Muhammad Asif (Appellant)For the Appellant Shoaib Akhtar: Mr. Abid Hasan Minto Sr. Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan & Mr. Bilal Minto, Advocate Supreme Court of Pakistan.
For the Appellant Muhammed Asif: Mr. Aftab Gul, Advocate.
For the Pakistan Cricket Board: Mr. Mark Gay, Solicitor, DLA Piper LLP, U.K.Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim:
1. The above Appeals are directed against the Decision dated 1.11.06 of the Anti Doping Commission (“ADC”) established under clause 5.7 of the Pakistan Cricket Board (“PCB”) Anti Doping Regulations. The Appellants are aggrieved by the Decision of the ADC which found them guilty of committing a doping offence as defined under clause 4.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations and imposed a two year ban on Shoaib Akhtar and a one year ban on Muhammad Asif under clauses 7 & 8 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations.2. The Appeals were filed by Shoaib Akhtar through counsel on 8.11.06 and Muhammad Asif on 6.11.06. The Appeals Committee held hearings in this matter on 15.11.06, 20.11.06 and 21.11.06, where submissions were made by the learned counsels, Mr. Abid Hasan Minto, Mr. Bilal Minto, Mr. Aftab Gul on behalf of the Appellants and Mr. Mark Gay on behalf of the PCB. On conclusion of the hearings, the Appeals Committee sought response from the Appellants in respect of various questions. The written response from Shoaib Akhtar was received by the Appeals Committee on 27.11.06 and from Muhammad Asif on 28.11.06. Both the Appeals of Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif are dealt with by way of this common decision.3. The admitted facts leading to the Appeals are as follows. On 14.9.06, the then Chairman Pakistan Cricket Board directed that dope tests may be carried out on all 19 players being considered for inclusion in the Pakistan Cricket Team participating in the ICC Champions Trophy. In pursuance of this directive, the PCB’s Anti Doping Control Officer (“ADCO”) notified the players to provide necessary urine samples. That in a one week period from 25.9.06 to 2.10.06, all 19 players provided urine samples to the ADCO and the same were dispatched to the Doping Control Centre Universiti Sains Malaysia, which is a laboratory duly accredited by the World Anti Doping Agency (“WADA”).4. The Malaysian laboratory first informed the PCB on 12.10.06, that of the 19 samples, 2 had tested positive for banned substances. On 17.10.06, the same laboratory confirmed that the two samples contained 19-Norandrosterone, greater than the threshold of 2 ng/ml. On 19.10.06, PCB was informed that the sample pertaining to Shoaib Akhtar was found to contain 19-Norandrosterone of 14.06 ng/ml while the sample pertaining to Muhammad Asif was found to contain 19-Norandrosterone of 13.07 ng/ml.5. 19-Norandrosterone is a metabolite of Nandrolone and is on the list of prohibited substances under the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which specifies the limit of 2 ng/ml. On 15.10.06, the PCB suspended Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif and decided to establish the ADC under clause 5.7 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. The ADC was empowered to determine whether Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif had committed a doping offence and, if so, what sanctions should be imposed on the players and for how long.6. That after recording the statements of the ADCO, both Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif were confronted with the adverse test results and their statements were also recorded by the ADC. The ADC also recorded the statements of the Pakistan Cricket Team Coach, Robert A. Woolmer, Team Physiotherapist, Darryn Lifson and Team Trainer, Murray Steveson as well as Professor Javed Akram and Dr. Syed Abbas Raza and afforded opportunity to Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif to put questions to the persons examined. It may be noted that despite repeated offers from the ADC, both Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif declined to be represented by legal counsel, although the former was assisted by Dr. Nauman Niaz before the ADC.7. It is worthwhile to note that the sample collection for the dope tests were conducted by the ADCO as per procedure prescribed under WADA’s International Standards for Testing, June 2003. The certificate of analysis from the Malaysian laboratory confirmed that the chain of custody of the samples was intact. Moreover, both Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammed Asif have conceded before the ADC that they were satisfied with the manner in which the urine samples had been obtained by the ADCO. Both players also declined the offer of the ADC to have their B samples tested. The Appellants’ stand on this issue remained unchanged before this Appeals Committee.8. Shoaib Akhtar’s defence to the charge of doping offence before the ADC was inter-alia as follows: that (i) his high protein intake and rigorous workout schedule over the years had caused endogenous production of 19-Norandrosterone in his system well over the prescribed limit of 2 ng/ml; (ii) that the nutritional supplements taken by him including Blaze Xtreme, Nitron 5, Size On, T-Bomb II, Promax 50 and Viper were not banned items1 ; (iii) that contamination in the aforesaid supplements taken by him could have been the reason for the elevated level of 19-Norandrosterone; and (iv) that he was never warned by the PCB about the Anti Doping Regulations.9. Muhammad Asif’s defence to the charge of doping offence before the ADC was more circumscribed. Muhammad Asif pleaded (i) that he had not knowingly taken any medicine or substance which could explain the test result; (ii) that he had started using supplements, including Promax, when he was in the U.K. three years ago; (iii) that he honestly did not know the effects of the supplements he was taking; and (iv) that when recently the Team. In response to the Appeals Committee questions, the counsel for Shoaib Akhtar provided a list of previously unspecified vitamin and herbal medicines also ingested by the Player. These were specified as Vivioptal, Surbex Z, Gonadil-f, Aswanghanda (Tribulus Terrestris) and Paullina Sorbilis (Guarna). Physiotherapist Mr. Darryn Lifson advised him to discontinue the use of supplements, he immediately stopped ingesting the same.10. After due deliberations, the ADC Decision concluded that “In the totality of circumstances [it was] not convinced that there was no fault or negligence on the part of Shoaib Akhtar or even no significant fault or negligence.” That Shoaib Akhtar “has committed a doping offence as defined in clause 4.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. There are no mitigating circumstances which would justify the imposition of a sanction less than the minimum prescribed namely a ban of two years.”11. In respect of Muhammad Asif, the ADC concluded that his case was “on a somewhat different footing with regard to the level of responsibility.” The ADC noted with consideration that (i) he joined the Pakistan Cricket Team in March 2006; (ii) he was not present at any lecture or session on anti doping organized by the PCB; (iii) there was uncertainty that he was even handed over the 2006 list of prohibited substances or the WADA Athelete Guide; (iv) he had stopped the use of supplements as soon as was told to do so by the Team Physiotherapist; and (v) his command over the English language is limited. The ADC concluded that it was “not convinced that Asif’s case is one of no fault or negligence. However, keeping in view the totality of the circumstances [the ADC was of the] view that it is one of no significant fault or negligence and that there are exceptional circumstances noted…hereinabove that justify a more lenient view than that taken by us in Shoaib Akhtar’s case.”12. It is worthwhile to note that the ADC which was a creature of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations, while repeatedly referring to the various PCB Anti Doping Regulations under which the players were charged, proceeded against and even punished, without any ostensible rationale sought to rely on distinct benchmarks of ‘No Fault or Negligence’ and ‘No Significant Fault or Negligence’ from the International Cricket Council (“ICC”) Anti Doping Code in its Decision. It may be mentioned that the ICC Anti Doping Code is to operate as the Doping Regulations for ICC Events2 and it was no one’s case before the ADC that the ICC Anti Doping Code would apply to the case of Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif. In fact, even Mr. Mark Gay clearly asserted that the PCB Anti Doping Regulations are the only regulations applicable to the present case.13. The ADC correctly noted that under clause 4.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations, it is provided inter alia that “A player commits a doping offence if: (a) a prohibited substance is present within the player’s body tissue or fluids, unless: (i) the player uses the prohibited substance for therapeutic purpose (see clause 4.4.); or (ii) there are exceptional circumstances (see clause 4.5)”. The ADC even took into account that ‘exceptional circumstances’ are defined under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations to exist if inter alia “the player held an honest and reasonable belief in a state of facts which if they existed, would mean that the player did not commit a doping offence” and that the burden to prove exceptional ( See Clause D of the ICC Anti Doping Code) circumstances lies on the player. However, the ADC proceeded to adjudge the case of Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif on the benchmarks provided under the ICC Anti Doping Code and not the PCB Anti Doping Regulations.14. The ADC proceeded to focus on the ICC Anti Doping Code benchmarks for exceptional circumstances of ‘No Fault or Negligence’ and ‘No Significant Fault or Negligence’, whereas the same find no mention under the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. According to the ADC, the burden and standard of proof for ‘No Fault or Negligence’ or ‘No Significant Fault or Negligence’ under the ICC Anti Doping Regulations are “very similar” to the WADA Code.3 The ADC Decision records that “Pakistan is a signatory to the Copenhagen Declaration establishing WADA and bound by the provisions of the WADA Anti Doping Code.” In this regard, this Appeals Committee has noted that although the Pakistan Olympic Association is a signatory to the Copenhagen Declaration, the same cannot be equated with the Federation of Pakistan nor will the same automatically bind the PCB. It may be added that in the section titled “Matters Not Provided For” the PCB Anti Doping Regulations clarify that only in the event of a dispute in connection to the PCB Anti Doping Regulations should the IOC/WADA law be followed. In his written submissions, Mr. Mark Gay also reasoned that “as the terms of the pertinent clauses of the [PCB] Anti Doping Regulations are, in our view, free from doubt or ambiguity, the situation anticipated by the [“Matters Not Provided] It is important to recognize that the ICC Anti Doping Code although largely WADA compliant, does have a few provisions which are different to the WADA Code. Most significantly, a player who is able to prove ‘No Fault or Negligence’ is found to have committed no violation. This is a departure from the WADA Code, which even under the circumstances of ‘No Fault or Negligence’ does not allow for a verdict of no violation but the same is only the basis for reduction in penalty. (see ICC Report to the Chief Executive’s Committee Meeting, Lords, June 2005). For” clause] simply does not arise.” There is considerable force in such submissions of Mr. Mark Gay and we accept the same. According to us, as there is no dispute or ambiguity with regard to the relevant clauses of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations and nor is the same claimed by any party, the question of resorting to the WADA Code does not arise. Moreover, as stated above, the ADC as well as this Appeals Committee are the creatures of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations and not the ICC Anti Doping Code or the WADA Code. Therefore, there is no doubt in our minds that the PCB Anti Doping Regulations are applicable to the present case of Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif who were tested in Pakistan by the PCB under its Regulations and not by any other international sports body.15. With due deference to the ADC, we cannot reconcile as to why the question of ‘exceptional circumstances’ was dealt with on the benchmarks of ‘No Fault or Negligence’ and ‘No Significant Fault or Negligence’ as provided by the ICC Anti Doping Code by the ADC, when the PCB Anti Doping Regulations clearly defined ‘exceptional circumstances’ on a significantly different plane. Under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations exceptional circumstances are defined as follows: “Exceptional circumstances exist if either: (a) the presence of the prohibited substance is beyond the player’s control; for example; i) the player has a natural testosterone: epitestosterone ratio above 6:1; or ii) the player is administered the prohibited substance in hospital with his knowledge in a life threatening situation); or (b) the player held an honest and reasonable belief in a state of facts which, if they existed, would mean that the player did not commit a doping offence.” Whereas, clause 9.5 of the ICC Anti Doping Code provides that “Finding of No Violation or Reduction of Period of Ineligibility Based on Exceptional Circumstances: 9.5.1. If the Cricketer establishes in a individual case involving an Anti Doping Code violation under Clause 3.1 (presence of Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers) or Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method under Clause 3.2 that he bears No Fault or Negligence [means that the Cricketer establishing that he did not know or suspect and could not reasonably have known or suspected even with the exercise of utmost caution, that he had Used or been administered the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method] for the violation, he shall be found to have committed no violation…” As is evident from the above, the standard of ‘exceptional circumstances’ under the ICC Anti Doping Code and the PCB Anti Doping Regulations is entirely different in terms of language, scope and meaning.16. The confusion between the applicability of standards of ‘exceptional circumstances’ under the ICC Anti Doping Code and PCB Anti Doping Regulations, fatally plagued the final decision of the ADC. This effect was debilitating. The distinction between the ICC Anti Doping Code and the PCB Anti Doping Regulations are striking. Under the ICC Anti Doping Code, clause 3.1.1, “It is each Cricket Player’s personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters his body. Cricket Player’s are responsible for any Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers found to be present in their bodily Specimens. Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Cricket Player’s part be demonstrated in order to establish an anti-doping violation under Clause 3.1.” The PCB Anti Doping Regulations impose no such onerous burdens on the Players. In fact, in sharp contrast, the PCB Anti Doping Regulations impose responsibility on the PCB itself for educating and informing the players on doping. Clause 2.2 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations provides that “The PCB aims to prevent the use of performance enhancing drugs and doping practices in Cricket…by (b) educating and informing persons about drugs in sport issues.” Similarly, clause 2.3 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations provides that “The PCB will also (b) develop and implement drug education and information programs for players, coaches, officials and medical and health practitioners.”17. It may be noted that under clause 8.3 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations, the ADC could only have reduced the minimum sentence of a 2 year ban “on basis of any report or evidence provided during the hearing by the PCB Anti Doping Medical Advisor.” Yet, the ADC proceeded to reduce the sentence on Muhammad Asif on wholly extraneous grounds. More glaring is the fact that on one hand the ADC concluded that there were ‘exceptional circumstances’ in the case of Muhammad Asif, yet proceeded to find him guilty of an offence of doping. This is quite contrary to the language of clause 4.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which provides that if the Player can establish ‘exceptional circumstances’ then no offence is committed.18. However, this is not the end of the matter. The aforesaid flaws plaguing the ADC Decision do not automatically resolve the serious charges and the complicated issues involved in the matter in favor of the Appellants before us. The Appeals Committee is duty bound to consider the defence advanced by the Appellants on the criteria and benchmark of the applicable law on the subject i.e. the PCB Anti Doping Regulations.19. The foremost argument advanced on behalf of Shoaib Akhtar’s learned counsels, Mr. Abid Hasan Minto and Mr. Bilal Minto is that the PCB Anti Doping Regulations do not apply at all to the case of Shoaib Akhtar. In this regard, reliance was placed on the opening paragraph preceding the preamble of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which records that “The following Doping Control Regulations will apply to all events organized by Pakistan Cricket Board…” The learned counsels argued that since Shoaib Akhtar was not tested during any ‘event’ organized by the PCB, but prior to an ICC event, therefore the PCB Anti Doping Regulations do not apply. With due respect, the aforesaid sentence cited by the learned counsels cannot be read in isolation without consideration of the operative part of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which provides inter alia under clause 3 that the Regulations apply to members, players and employees and contractors of the PCB. Any doubt on this score is further resolved by considering the definition of ‘Player’ under the clause 1.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which provides that “Player means a person who participates (whether in competition or out of competition) in the sport of Cricket under the jurisdiction or the auspices of the PCB or uses the facilities of the PCB” (emphasis ours). Therefore, we are of the firm view that the PCB Anti Doping Regulations would apply to Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif notwithstanding that they are tested by PCB whether in competition or out of competition.20. The learned counsels representing Shoaib Akhtar also laid particular emphasis on the scientific debate surrounding the level of 19-Norandrosterone and questioned the prescribed limit of 2 ng/ml by citing medical literature which argued that higher levels of 19-Norandrosterone was possible by way of endogenous production. However, this is not a new debate and has been repeatedly raised in international doping trials and also rejected with equal consistence. In the case of B v. FINA, CAS 2001/A/337, the Court of Arbitration for Sport held that “the Panel does not share the Appellant’s opinion that the threshold of 2 ng/ml of NA in male urine is generally not reliable or that there was a grey zone between 2ng/ml and 5 ng/ml where endogenous production of such levels of NA was possible.” This same view is also recorded in the 2003 Nandrolone Progress Report to the UK Sports Council from the Expert Committee on Nandrolone which concluded that “Having considered all the information available to it, the Committee concluded that exercise may, in some cases, produce a small increase in the urinary concentration of 19-Norandrosterone, but found no reason to believe this would exceed 2 nanograms per milliliter, and thus the current reporting threshold of 2 nanograms per milliliter was regarded as appropriate for sportsmen.” Moreover, this Appeals Committee cannot go behind the 2 ng/ml threshold adopted by the PCB in its Anti Doping Regulations. The fact that Shoaib Akhtar declined the offer of the ADC that he take the urine test GC-C-IRMS to determine whether or not the high level was due to endogenous production, notwithstanding the limited reliability of such test, is also not insignificant. Therefore, we are not persuaded by the defence that Shoaib Akthar’s positive test on 19-Norandrosterone was caused due to endogenous production on account of his diet and exercise regime.21. The last argument advanced by the learned counsels appearing on behalf of both the Appellants before us was that the positive test of 19-Norandrosterone was caused by the possible contamination/mislabeling of nutritional supplements ingested by Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif. In particular, the learned counsel, Mr. Abid H. Minto forcefully argued (i) that it was rather strange for the ADC to observe that “None of the supplements being used by Shoaib Akhtar were offered to us for getting them analyzed for possible contamination” when the supplements had already been consumed in the normal course; and (ii) that the observation made by the ADC is otherwise unwarranted as no such offer was made to his Client.4 The reasoning advanced by the learned counsel is not without merit and significantly our review of the record of proceedings before the ADC confirms that no such offer for testing the supplements for contamination was ever made to Shoaib Akhtar by the ADC. It was contended by the learned counsel that at no stage was any player informed or warned of the danger of supplement use by the PCB and that therefore, in such situation ‘exceptional circumstances exist’ as defined under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. The learned counsels relied on the second part of the definition of ‘exceptional circumstances’ under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations which provides that if the Players held an “honest and reasonable belief in a state of. It is noteworthy that although the case of Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif stood on the same plane with regard to contamination and mislabeling, no such observation was made by the ADC in respect of Muhammad Asif. facts which, if they existed, would mean that the player did not commit doping offence.”22. In our view, the argument on ‘exceptional circumstances’ and the test of “honest and reasonable belief” as provided under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations places the burden on Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif to prove the following: (i) that use of supplements can be the cause of positive testing for 19-Norandrosterone; and (ii) that supplements are not included in the list of banned substances as prescribed by the PCB and/or that PCB has not warned them against the use of supplements.23. In the submissions made by the PCB Counsel, Mr. Mark Gay, and the case law referred, it has been stated that the issue of contamination of nutritional supplements is so significant and widespread that international sports bodies strongly warn against the use of supplements by athletes. Contamination and mislabeling of supplements is such an accepted phenomenon that international sporting bodies now warn athletes that nutritional supplements may include prohibited substances even though the same are not included on the label and therefore may result in positive testing. The finding of the Court of Arbitration for Sport in the case of H. Knauss v. FIS, CAS 2005/A/847 illustrates the point vividly when it records, “The Appellant ingested a nutritional supplement which, according to the parties uncontested and plausible submissions, was the cause of the Appellant’s adverse analytical findings. The Appellant consumed said product despite the express warnings of the national and international sports federations, the Austrian Anti-Doping Committee and WADA, warnings which clearly and repeatedly over the past years have emphasized the risk of contamination and/or mislabeling in nutritional supplements.” 24. Even professional trainers of the prestigious Association of Tennis Players (ATP) were not immune from stumbling over the use of nutritional supplements. In 2004, ATP Trainers handed out supplements to professional tennis players, which caused them to test positive for Norandrosterone. The dangers lurking in the use of supplements gained new notoriety when professional tennis player Greg Rusedski tested positive for 19-Norandrosterone in 2004 after ingesting supplements handed over to him by the ATP trainers. Sufficient material has been brought before this Appeals Committee to conclude that nutritional supplements used by Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif, which we may add are well known branded supplements readily available in the open market, could have contained an undeclared prohibited substance that resulted in their positive test for 19-Norandrosterone.25. The next question which requires consideration is whether Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif can be said to have had an “honest and reasonable belief” that the nutritional supplements being ingested by them did not contain any banned substance. According to Mr. Mark Gay, the definition of “exceptional circumstances would embrace circumstances where a player honestly and Although the WADA Code incorporates a strict liability rule on issue of doping offences, it is important to at least take note of the clarification provided in the illustrations to the WADA Code article 10.5. According to such illustration, the WADA Code seeks to deny the defence of ‘No Fault or Negligence’ to athletes testing positive due to use of supplements, because, “athletes have been warned against the possibility of supplement contamination.” reasonably took something believing it to be clean, but found out subsequently that it was contaminated.” We are in agreement with this view. According to this Appeals Committee, the answer to the aforesaid question of honest and reasonable belief would turn on whether nutritional supplements were included in the list of banned substances provided under the items listed in PCB’s Anti Doping Regulations or, whether PCB at any stage even warned the Players against the use of supplements.26. The PCB’s Anti Doping Regulations although clearly specify the limit of 2 ng/ml for 19 Norandrosterone, but are remarkably silent on the issue of supplements. The only document brought on the record of the ADC which clearly warns players as to nutritional supplements is the publication titled “Athlete Guide”. The Athlete Guide is a WADA publication and provides inter-alia that “Extreme caution is recommended regarding supplement use. It is WADA’s position that a good diet is of utmost importance to athletes. The use of dietary supplements by athletes is a concern because in many countries the manufacturing and labeling of supplements may not follow strict rules, which may lead to a supplement containing an undeclared substance that is prohibited under anti doping regulations. A significant number of positive tests have been attributed to the misuse of supplements and taking a poorly labeled dietary supplement is not an adequate defence in a doping hearing.”27. The PCB’s Anti Doping Control Officer Dr. Sohail Saleem, was specifically asked by the ADC as to how many times were the players advised on Anti Doping Regulations in the past year. He answered, not even once. Dr. Sohail Saleem stated that in 2002, an Urdu translation of the Anti Doping Regulations drafted by Dr. Meesaq Rizvi was distributed to the then players of the Pakistan Cricket Team. Although, there is no evidence that such translation was given to Shoaib Akhtar, the same is inconsequential as we have seen that such translation also does not contain any warning or caution regarding supplements. Moreover, no PCB official has stated that the 2002 lecture on anti doping which was apparently attended by Shoaib Akhtar warned players with regard to supplements. In fact, Dr. Sohail Saleem, PCB’s Anti Doping Officer has candidly admitted before the ADC that he could not say if the players were told about the use of supplements not on the prohibited list.28. As stated above, the Athlete Guide clearly contains strong warnings against the use of supplements. Therefore, it is important to consider whether the Appellants were made aware of the Athlete Guide. According to the ADCO, Dr. Sohail Saleem’s statement before the ADC, when he received the 2006 Prohibited List and the Athlete Guide from the ICC, he handed 24 copies to the Team Physiotherapist Darryn Lifson for distribution to each player, but was unaware whether Mr. Lifson actually gave the copies as directed. This Athlete Guide in our mind is a critical document, in so far as it is the only document produced before us which contains warnings on supplements.29. The Pakistan Cricket Team Physiotherapist, Darryn Lifson stated before the ADC that “Prior to the team going on the England tour, in about August 2004 [date is apparently incorrectly recorded], at a practice session in the Gaddafi Stadium, Dr. Sohail Saleem handed over to me WADA publications ‘the Athlete Guide’ and ‘2006 Prohibited List’ and asked me to distribute the same to the players. I told the players that they should take a copy of these publications and study them…I cannot remember whether Shoaib Akhtar or Muhammad Asif were present at that time and took their copies” (emphasis is ours). Darryn Lifson conceded that “I have myself not given any formal lecture to the players about the drugs or the Anti Doping Regulations. It is within the scope of my duties to advise them about drugs and the Anti Doping Regulations. I have discharged this duty in the manner described above and by telling the players not to take anything that is banned or prohibited. As regards the use of dietary supplements, this is part of scope and duties of the trainer Murray Steveson.”30. The Pakistan Cricket Team’s Fitness Trainer, Murray Steveson stated before the ADC that “I tell players about the diet that they should follow but not about any dietary supplements for which I have no responsibility. I have no responsibility in matters relating to drug and anti drug regulations.”31. When Pakistan Team Coach Robert A. Woolmer, was shown the WADA 2006 Prohibited List and the Athlete Guide by the ADC, he did not recognize the same as having been provided to him or the players.32. In view of the above, it is plainly evident that neither Shoaib Akhtar nor Muhammad Asif were ever warned or cautioned against taking supplements. Only recently, in August 2006, when Muhammad Asif himself volunteered to Darryn Lifson that he was taking supplements, was he told to discontinue the same. The vast record of the proceedings before the ADC and this Appeals Committee establishes that Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif were never advised against taking supplements, nor were they even provided with any international or local publications warning them against the use of supplements. Hence, this Appeals Committee by a majority of 2 to 1 is of the considered view that Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif have successfully established that they held an honest and reasonable belief that the supplements ingested by them did not contain any prohibited substances. Accordingly, the Appellants have met the test of ‘exceptional circumstances’ as laid down under clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. This Appeals Committee therefore holds that Shoaib Akhtar and Muhammad Asif cannot be deemed to have committed a doping offence under clause 4.1 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations. The ban and punishment imposed by the ADC Decision dated 1.11.06 is hereby set aside as being contrary to the provisions of clause 4.5 of the PCB Anti Doping Regulations.Karachi. Dated: 5 December 2006 ____________________ _____________ Fakhruddin G. Ebrahim Hasib Ahsan (C h a i r m a n) (M e m b e r) The Member, Dr. Danish Zaheer, has expressed a dissenting opinion.

Share
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Linkedin

Related Posts

All Rights Reserved 2025.
Làm thế nào để nhận 200$ ngay khi đăng nhập sxmb? Bạn đã biết cách đăng ký xstd để nhận 200$ chưa? Tại sao xskt lại tặng 200$ cho người chơi mới? Nhận 200$ từ kqxs có thật sự dễ như lời đồn? Cần làm gì để rinh 200$ miễn phí từ xsvt? xskg thưởng 200$ cho lần đăng nhập đầu tiên, thật hay giả? Chỉ cần đăng ký sxkt là có 200$, có đúng không? Làm sao để nhận ưu đãi 200$ từ xskh nhanh nhất? 200$ từ sxtd có rút được về tài khoản ngân hàng không? Có nên đăng ký xstp chỉ để nhận 200$? Điều kiện để nhận 200$ khi đăng nhập xsag là gì? Tại sao nhiều người đăng nhập xsvl để nhận 200$? xsct tặng 200$ có yêu cầu nạp tiền không? Cách nào để nhận 200$ từ xstn mà không tốn phí? Đăng nhập xstg nhận 200$ có cần xác minh danh tính không? Nhận 200$ miễn phí từ xsbl có an toàn không? xsla có thực sự tặng 200$ cho tài khoản mới không? Làm sao để tận dụng tối đa 200$ từ xsbt? xshg bonus 200$ áp dụng cho ai? Nhận 200$ từ xspy có giới hạn thời gian không? Có khó để đăng ký xstv và nhận thưởng 200$ không? 200$ từ xstt dùng để chơi game gì? xsbd tặng 200$ có cần nhập mã khuyến mãi không? Bao lâu thì nhận được 200$ sau khi đăng ký xsgl? xscm có bắt buộc cược trước khi rút 200$ không? Làm thế nào để đăng nhập xsdt nhận 200$ mà không gặp lỗi? xsdn thưởng 200$ cho lần đăng nhập đầu, có thật 100% không? Cần chuẩn bị gì trước khi đăng ký xsdl để nhận 200$? 200$ từ kqmb có thể chuyển cho người khác không? kqsx có khuyến mãi nào ngoài 200$ không? 200$ của xsst có giá trị bao lâu? Làm sao để biết mình đủ điều kiện nhận 200$ từ xsbp? sxmn có hoàn lại 200$ nếu không dùng hết không? Nhận 200$ từ xsqb có phải trả phí ẩn không? xamb bonus 200$ có yêu cầu đặt cược tối thiểu không? Có thể nhận 200$ từ sskt nhiều lần không? xsnt có hỗ trợ người chơi nhận 200$ qua điện thoại không? Đăng nhập xsjt trên máy tính có nhận 200$ như điện thoại không? sxkh có bắt buộc tải app để nhận 200$ không? 200$ từ xamt có thể rút toàn bộ không? kq30 thưởng 200$ có áp dụng cho người chơi cũ không? Cách nào để nhận 200$ từ sxtn nhanh nhất trong ngày? 200$ từ xahg có dùng để cược tất cả trò chơi không? sxkg có yêu cầu xác thực email để nhận 200$ không? Nhận 200$ từ xsld có mất nhiều thời gian không? xsnb bonus 200$ có thể kết hợp với khuyến mãi khác không? Có bị giới hạn quốc gia khi nhận 200$ từ sxtg không? sxdn tặng 200$ cho người mới, có cần mã mời không? Có thể vừa nhận 200$ vừa nhận thêm ưu đãi khác tại xsqt không? 200$ từ sxcm có áp dụng cho cá cược thể thao không? sxvt có tặng 200$ cho người chơi đăng ký qua app không? Làm sao để rút 200$ thưởng từ sxhg nhanh chóng? sxbd bonus 200$ có yêu cầu vòng cược bao nhiêu lần? 🎁 How to Download the thunderpick App on Any Device 💰 Step-by-Step Guide to Installing the coolcat Mobile App 📲 bitplay App Review: Smoother Interface, Better Gaming 🎰 Why the New caesars entertainment App Is a Game-Changer 💴 stations App: Fast Download, Easy Installation 🎉 Experience Better Gaming with the New super slots App 🕹 How to Install the the money factory App on Android and iOS 🎮 bwin App Interface: What's New and Improved 💵 The Ultimate vblink 777 App Installation Guide 🎁 Download the slingo App in Minutes – Here's How 💰 planet 7 App Update: Better UI, Faster Load Times 📲 Unlock a Premium Gaming Experience with the golden palace App 🎰 The New espnbet App: Optimized for Speed and Fun 💴 Quick Guide: How to Download and Set Up the aria resort App 🎉 slot machines Mobile App: Download, Install, and Win Big 🕹 How to Access trustdice Anywhere with Their Mobile App 🎮 xbet App Review: Enhanced User Interface Explained 💵 Installing the gtbets App: What You Need to Know 🎁 Enjoy Seamless Gaming with the rigged Mobile App 💰 Mobile Gaming Reimagined: cagliari App Interface Upgrade 📲 freeslots App for iOS: Download and Install Easily 🎰 Download the Official fishdom App Safely 💴 paris match App: Your Gateway to Smooth Online Casino Action 🎉 Fast & Secure decode App Installation Tutorial 🕹 Better Performance, Better Gameplay: Try pokergo App 🎮 How to Download the pokerstars Casino App in 2025 💵 Is the spinpals App Worth It? Full Review Inside 🎁 How to Install the takbet App on Any Smartphone 💰 Downloading black lotus App: A Beginner’s Guide 📲 New Interface, Better Experience: lucky red App Insights 🎰 liveme App Optimization: What’s Been Improved? 💴 How to Maximize Your Gameplay on the clubwpt App 🎉 hardrock App Update: What’s New and Why It Matters 🕹 bongo App Setup Guide for First-Time Users 🎮 Why More Players Are Switching to the big dollar App 💵 silver oak Mobile Experience: Better Than Desktop? 🎁 How the hippodrome App Enhances Your Casino Sessions 💰 Get Started with the millionaire App in 3 Simple Steps 📲 How to Access Sports Betting on the betking App 🎰 Updated Design, Smoother Navigation: Inside the worldwinner App 💴 Everything You Need to Know About high roller’s Mobile App 🎉 How to Use the sidepot App Like a Pro 🕹 The punt App: Now with an Optimized Gaming Interface 🎮 Install the funzcity App and Play Anytime, Anywhere 💵 What's So Special About the meatspin App UI Update? 🎁 Install the bet365 App for a Fast, Smooth Casino Experience 💰 Top 5 Reasons to Download the zynga App Today 📲 How to Set Up the betrivers App on Your Phone 🎰 youwager Mobile App Walkthrough: Features, UI, and Setup 💴 The New Look of dream team: App Design Breakdown 🎉 The Ultimate winner App User Experience Guide 🕹 scrooge App: How to Download & Start Winning Fast 🎮 How to Customize the kent App for Better Play 💵 Simple Steps to Install the fortnitetracker App on Android 🎁 Download the bet9ja App for a Premium Casino Feel 💰 Exploring the New Features of the betano App 📲 Is the betnow App Better Than the Website? 🎰 mgm grand las vegas App Setup: What Gamers Need to Know 💴 Mastering the juju App Interface in 2025 🎉 Download vblink777 Mobile: Easy Access to Slots & Sports 🕹 Try the All-New fliff App and Win More 🎮 Everything’s Better with the scrabble online App 💵 New to racing games? Start with the App! 🎁 The raging bull App Experience: Smooth, Simple, Exciting 🎁 How to Download and Update the daddy App 💰 Best Features of the hasbro Mobile App 📲 world of tanks App: Mobile Casino Just Got Better 🎰 New and Improved: Why We Love the ea sports App 💴 Enjoy Faster Load Times with the Updated betway App 🎉 coins App Now Available – Here’s How to Get It 🕹 Upgrade Your Game with the rembrandt Mobile App 🎮 Full Setup Guide: bellagio las vegas App for iPhone Users 💵 Better Controls, Better Gaming: Explore the voodoo App 🎁 How to Access Live Casino Games on the index App 💰 Is yabby App Compatible with Your Device? Find Out 📲 A Cleaner, Sleeker betanysports App Interface Awaits 🎰 New Design, Same Winning Experience: rocket App 💴 Installing the mohegan sun App: FAQs Answered 🎉 Experience Lightning-Fast Casino Access via rhino App 🕹 Download bonanza: The App That Makes Betting Easy 🎮 pepe App Installation Tips and Troubleshooting 💵 All You Need to Know About 1win Mobile Setup 🎁 How to Download the csg App Without Errors 💰 Discover Better Gaming Features on the tab App 📲 From Download to Deposit: Using the slots App 🎰 Why Gamers Are Loving the New crypto App 💴 Get the Best coral Experience on Mobile 🎉 Quick Guide: seven App for Tablets and Phones 🕹 No Lag, No Stress: boomerang App Performance Review 🎮 Why Every Casino Fan Should Download the blast App 💵 Enhanced Graphics and Gameplay on the gala App 🎁 Download the syndicate App for Non-Stop Action 💰 Your Casino Companion: The betwhale Mobile App 📲 From Installation to Winning: 888 App Journey 🎰 Play Safer and Smarter with the sbobet App 💴 What to Expect from the Latest nrg App 🎉 The Future of Mobile Casino: Inside the wild App 🕹 Level Up Your Bets with the snatch App 🎮 Casino On-the-Go: Everything About the evo App 🎁 Paano I-download ang inplay App sa Iyong Telepono? 💰 Gabay sa Pag-install ng 99bet App sa Android 📲 I-download ang 60win App Ngayon para sa Mas Magandang Laro 🎰 Mas Pinadaling Interface: Bagong Bersyon ng melbet App 💴 jollibet App: Hakbang-hakbang na Gabay sa Pag-install 🎉 Bakit Dapat Mong I-install ang jili slot App Ngayon? 🕹 rich711 App: Mas Mabilis, Mas Maganda, Mas Astig! 🎮 Paano Mag-enjoy ng Seamless Casino Experience gamit ang tayabet App 💵 phl63 Mobile App: Alamin Kung Paano Ito Gamitin 🎁 unobet App Download: Libre at Walang Hassle! 💰 Upgrade na ang 63jili App: Subukan Mo Na! 📲 Bagong UI ng mwplay888 App: Mas Makinis ang Experience 🎰 I-install ang gold99 App at Maglaro Kahit Saan 💴 Madaling Paraan Para I-download ang jolibet App 🎉 ubet95 App Installation Guide Para sa mga Baguhan 🕹 nice88 App: Mas Pinaganda ang Design at Navigation 🎮 Maglaro ng Casino Games Gamit ang jili777 App 💵 Bakit Patok ang Bagong Bersyon ng nn777 App? 🎁 phlove App: Mas Magaan, Mas Mabilis Mag-load 💰 Quick Guide sa jiliko App Download Para sa iOS 📲 Mas Mahusay na Gaming Experience gamit ang 55bmw App 🎰 phoenix game Mobile App Review: Worth It Ba? 💴 Bakit Kailangan Mong I-download ang 8k8 App 🎉 Top Features ng cgebet App na Dapat Mong Malaman 🕹 I-download ang 7up gaming App: Narito ang Mga Hakbang 🎮 diamond game App: Mas User-Friendly na Interface 💵 Full Guide sa hellowin App para sa Mga Filipino Players 🎁 Narito Kung Paano I-install ang win88 App sa 2025 💰 Paano Ma-maximize ang big win App para sa Online Casino 📲 Mas Pinaganda ang kabibe game App UI sa Bagong Update 🎰 Alamin ang Features ng Bagong sabong bet App 💴 phcity App Download + Installation Made Simple 🎉 colorplay App para sa Android at iOS – Alin ang Mas Maganda? 🕹 I-explore ang tongits go App: Mas Masayang Maglaro 🎮 Ano’ng Bago sa slotsgo Mobile App? 💵 spinph App Interface: Bagong Look, Bagong Feeling 🎁 go perya App: Download Now, Play Anytime 💰 Easy Steps Para I-install ang casino frenzy Casino App 📲 Bakit Mas OK ang aurora game App Kumpara sa Browser Version? 🎰 Paano I-set Up ang escala gaming App nang Mabilis 💴 I-download ang winning plus App: Simula ng Masayang Paglalaro 🎉 Mas Pinabilis ang Performance ng Bagong bingo plus App 🕹 Saan I-download ang Official ph dream App? 🎮 747 live App Guide para sa Lahat ng Uri ng Phones 💵 Mas Secure na Paglalaro Gamit ang niceph App 🎁 lucky cola App Download: Para sa Real-Time Casino Experience 💰 I-try ang Enhanced pera play App Interface Today! 📲 ezjili App para sa Mobile – Lahat ng Kailangan Mong Malaman 🎰 Top Benefits ng Pag-install ng tamabet App 💴 I-install ang bw321 App at Simulan ang Iyong Casino Journey 🎉 Alamin ang Compatibility ng ibetph App sa Iyong Device 🕹 Mas Magandang Design, Mas Masayang Laro – boss77 App 🎮 jilibay App Installation Issues? Narito ang Solusyon 💵 Paano Mag-update ng betvisa App sa Pinakabagong Bersyon 🎁 Download 7xm App: Hassle-Free Gaming 💰 I-download ang bet86 App Para sa Real-Time na Sports Betting 📲 otsobet App UI: Paborito ng Maraming Players 🎰 Alamin Kung Bakit Mas Prefer ng Users ang tapwin App 💴 Pinakamadaling Paraan Para I-install ang wjevo App 🎉 betx24 App: All-in-One na Laro at Betting Platform 🕹 Mas Maraming Features sa Bagong peso888 App 🎮 Secure at Safe ba ang winhq App? 💵 Paano Gamitin ang smbet App Step-by-Step 🎁 I-download at I-enjoy ang bet999 App Kahit Nasaan 🎁 Tips sa Mas Magandang Gameplay gamit ang c9taya App 💰 80jili App Overview para sa New Users 📲 peso63 App sa Android: Kompleto at Mabilis 🎰 Mas Responsive na UI sa Latest xojili App 💴 I-install ang ph646 App sa Tatlong Hakbang 🎉 I-unlock ang Full Casino Experience gamit ang jilibee App 🕹 w500 App Features: Bakit Ito Naiiba 🎮 Enjoy Online Games with the New mnl63 App 💵 Simpleng Gabay sa 49jili App Interface 🎁 I-explore ang New Look ng og777 App 💰 lodi777 App Update: Mas Malinis na UI 📲 ji777 App: Mas Astig na Betting Platform 🎰 Paano Maglaro ng Live Casino sa mnl777 App 💴 Enhanced Mobile Interface ng 999jili App 🎉 I-download ang th777 App at Manalo ng Malaki 🕹 Mas Makulay ang Interface ng winph99 App 2025 🎮 Bakit Patok ang haha777 App sa Pilipinas 💵 Tips at Tricks sa Paggamit ng top646 Mobile App 🎁 Paano Gamitin ang fc178 App para sa Sports Betting 💰 jilivip App: Mobile Casino Para sa Lahat 📲 Paano Magkaroon ng Mas Makinis na Experience sa 77ph App 🎰 Download wjslot App: Hakbang Para sa Baguhan 💴 Alamin ang In-app Features ng lol646 Platform 🎉 Best Settings Para sa fachai App 🕹 Mas Madaling Login gamit ang ph888 App 🎮 User Feedback: Bakit Love Nila ang jilievo App 💵 phbet App para sa Pro Gamblers at Newbies 🎁 Install aceph App Para sa Ultimate Casino Access 💰 Bakit Mas Prefer ng Lahat ang plusph App 📲 Bagong Version ng jili7 App: Ano’ng Bago? 🎰 Discover the Smoother lodi291 App Interface 💴 I-download ang vvjl App: Ligtas at Mabilis 🎉 Guide sa phpvip App Installation sa 2025 🕹 Mas Magaan na phcash App para sa Lahat ng Devices 🎮 Lahat ng Laro sa Isang App: 711bet 💵 ssbet77 App para sa On-the-Go Casino Lovers 🎁 30jili App: Paboritong App ng Online Gamers 💰 Bakit Sulit ang 66win App sa 2025 📲 Masayang Maglaro gamit ang hot646 App 🎰 I-download Ngayon: ta777 App para sa Android at iPhone 💴 Gamitin ang phjoin App para sa Mas Secure na Transaksyon 🎉 phfun App: No Lag, No Hassle 🕹 Laro Anytime Anywhere gamit ang okebet App 🎮 Mas Malinaw na Graphics sa Bagong jilibet App 💵 Ultimate Casino App: phjoy ang Sagot 🎁 I-download ang merryph App: Hakbang ng Mga Winners 💰 sg777 App: Mobile Gaming Reimagined 📲 Maglaro ng Slots Gamit ang vipph App 🎰 phtaya App para sa Real-Time na Sports Odds 💴 Install winph App: Simulan ang Iyong Panalo 🎉 phwin App Experience: Mula Download Hanggang Panalo 🕹 Gusto Mo Bang Manalo? Gamitin ang taya777 App 🎮 Subukan ang Bagong Interface ng ph365 App 💵 Mag-enjoy sa Casino On-the-Go gamit ang slotvip App 🎁 tg777 App: Level Up ang Iyong Casino Experience!